Changing the behavior of the comma operator

[captaindet]

On 2014-03-25 12:33, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> After the recent discussions regarding the comma operator, and after
> inspecting the patterns of code affected by it, Walter and I would
> back up the following change to the D language:
>
> 1. The comma operator stays with its current syntax.
>
> 2. The semantics is the same unless warnings are enabled with "-w"
>
> 3. In "-w" mode, semantics are changed in that the type of the comma
> operator is NOT the type of its last expression, but instead it's
> void.
>
> 4. Later on the warning will be promoted to a deprecation followed by
> removal from the language.

mwould this effect comma usage inside for-loops as well or will this be special cased? i would not like to see it go from for-loops. i don't mind otherwise.

/det