More radical ideas about gc and reference counting

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/1/2014 7:01 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> The proposal was to get rid of class dtors, in which case this code will
> no longer work. Is that really the direction we want to move in?

My point was that the compiler wasn't ignoring destructors for fields.

Who should call the class destructor and when is a different issue.