Parallel execution of unittests

[bearophile via Digitalmars-d]

Walter Bright:

> You've already got it working with version, that's what version 
> is for. Why add yet another way to do it?

Because I'd like something better. It's an idiom that I have used 
many times (around 15-20 times). I'd like the compiler (or build 
tool) to avoid me to specify two times what the main module is.

Also, the current way to do it, in those modules I have to 
specify the module name two times (once at the top and once at 
the bottom, unless I use some compile-time syntheses of the 
version identifier from the current module name).

Bye,
bearophile