The Current Status of DQt

[Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d]

On 2014-05-04 09:26, w0rp wrote:
>
> Qt 4 support basically arises from what is easy to do right now.
> Supporting Qt 5 doesn't seem that far off. I went with Qt 4 for now
> because it's easier, and at this stage it's more important to work with
> something that can actually work and learn from that, than to try and
> work with something which might not actually work at all.

Nice work, I think Qt 4 is a very nice start and can help bring a lot 
more interest in D from the C++ crowd if it's successfully implemented, 
I think these people worry mostly about using the same data types and 
interface in a new programming language.