[OT] Go officially won't get generics

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 21:09:38 UTC, Bienlein wrote:
> I agree with Paulo. At 54:40 he says what Paulo has already 
> quoted. And "we are done" means "that's it, folks". It even 
> sounds to me like the language is finished and it will be left 
> like that.

Well, he had previously stated that there would be no breaking 
changes, and that if there were changes it would have to be 
called "go version 2 or something". So when generics were brought 
up he stated that there were no plans for generics and "I said we 
are going to leave the language, we are done" (with version 1 
semantics).

Ola..