radical ideas about GC and ARC : need to be time driven?

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 10 May 2014 at 19:17:02 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
> My concerns as Dlang user are :
>  - Even if GC is the solution, how long I need suffer with 
> destructor's issues (calls order)?

What issues do you have with destructors and how they affect you?

>  - When we will able to see a performant GC implementation can 
> satisfy someone like Manu :) ? Months, years, a decade?

Neither GC nor C heap will satisfy Manu's requirements. When it 
comes to shooters, the only way is to not allocate and write 
accurate code, even in C++. Even substitution of allocator won't 
help him, if the code relies on GC in a non-trivial way.