std.experimental – DConf?

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d]

On 29/05/14 20:46, Dmitry Olshansky via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Personally I believe that anything not stable enough simply wouldn't work
> sitting in Phobos. The release cycle is like 4? months, patches need review (by
> whom? if its just smb's experiment).
> And there is the question of keeping 2 forks of the project - one for
> code.dlang.org and the other for std.experimental.

If something's made it to std.experimental, is there any reason why there needs 
to be a maintained version in code.dlang.org ... ?

As for cycle -- surely an option here is to have a faster Phobos-only release 
cycle that brings in updates _only_ of experimental modules.