std.experimental – DConf?

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 5/29/14, 6:50 AM, Wyatt wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 May 2014 at 13:34:26 UTC, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>
>> Minor point -- is it really going to be the clunky std.experimental,
>> or is it going to be something elegant like exp.* ... ?
>>
>> I would prefer the latter. :-)
>
> I think I would too.  But failing that, since we have packages now,
> would std.experimental.* be an acceptable compromise?
>
> -Wyatt

Last thing we want is a terse nice name for something that's very likely 
to change.

Also please don't analyze this to death. It's meant to reduce friction, 
not increase this.


Andrei