std.benchmark

[Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d]

On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 22:07 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
> It was a solid review cycle that prompted good things to fix and 
> improve. std.benchmark will be part of std iff we make it so. -- Andrei

Clearly the data about the things is in the email thread, but might it
be worth creating a summary document so there is a definitive "todo
list"?

There is then also the issue of:

1. Completing the todo list for a new review for entry into Phobos;
versus

2. Extending the framework to handle multiple runs, and statistics on
the dataset.

Should these be seen as in competition (so that all work on 2 should
happen in a separate branch to that on 1), or whether 2 should be seen
as contributing to 1.

No problems with either direction, but it is probably a good idea to
take a view on this early.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder