RFC: moving forward with @nogc Phobos
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Oct 1 23:29:24 PDT 2014
On 01/10/14 19:25, Oren T wrote:
> The idea is that the unique property is very short-lived: the caller
> immediately assigns it to a pointer of the appropriate policy: either RC
> or GC. This keeps the callee agnostic of the chosen policy and does not
> require templating multiple versions of the code. The allocator
> configured for the thread must match the generated code at the call site
> i.e. if the caller uses RC pointers the allocator must allocate space
> for the reference counter (at negative offset to keep compatibility).
Can't we do something like this, or it might be what you're proposing:
Foo foo () { return new Foo; }
@gc a = foo(); // a contains an instance of Foo allocated with the GC
@rc b = foo(); // b contains an instance of Foo allocated with the RC
allocator
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list