scope() statements and return

[Shammah Chancellor via Digitalmars-d]

On 2014-10-04 21:44:43 +0000, Andrei Alexandrescu said:

> On 10/3/14, 8:01 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Friday, 3 October 2014 at 19:35:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> I guess I'm convinced it adds more complication than expressiveness!
>>> 
>> 
>> True for return, but throw is a stupid limitation( as it do not prevent
>> the scope to throw at all, simply forc to hide it, which is only worse).
> 
> Yah, nonlocal returns are odd but throw should be perfectly fine (and 
> good to have). -- Andrei

They were removed because they stop the propigation of Errors when and 
if they were to throw.  This was already discussed quite a bit months 
ago.  My original message was not intended to respawn the debate.

Here's the dbug: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11574

I'm not sure why it's still open actually.

-Shammah