Make const, immutable, inout, and shared illegal as function attributes on the left-hand side of a function
Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Oct 12 04:24:09 PDT 2014
On 12/10/14 12:53, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> D2 is, for the most part, excellent in this respect, but it could and should be
> even better. Well-managed, well-documented and well-publicized breaking changes
> in support of usability and correctness are desirable, not something to be avoided.
I should add here -- I recognize the basic problem that faces any language when
you have newcomers (or potential corporate adopters) downloading the latest
compiler, downloading some codebase of interest to them, and finding that it
doesn't build because of a backwards-incompatible change. Even when that change
was 100% justified, you risk being seen as unstable, untrustworthy, etc., and
many people are not patient enough to stick around to hear that justification.
Now, that said, I think it's helpful to try and change the conversation from,
"Break/don't break" to, "What would be the circumstances under which it could be
feasible to make these desirable breaking changes?"
The original version of this email had some thoughts on that, but to be honest,
I'd rather just ask the question, without making any assumptions about what the
answer could or should be.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list