Program logic bugs vs input/environmental errors

[Dan Olson via Digitalmars-d]

Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> writes:

> On 10/15/2014 7:35 AM, Dan Olson wrote:
>> That is what I am looking for, just being able to continue from a failed
>> assert in a unittest.
>
> Just use enforce() or something similar instead of assert(). Nothing
> says you have to use assert() in a unittest.

Makes sense.  However it is druntime and phobos unittests that already use assert.  I have convinced myself that catching Throwable is just fine in my case because at worst, unittests that follow an Error might be tainted, but only a perfect score of passing all tests really counts.
-- 
dano