C++ Ranges proposal for the Standard Library

[monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 17:31:18 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> I agree. It's like "foreach" in D. It's less powerful and 
> foundational than a "for" loop (in fact, the compiler 
> internally rewrites foreach into for), but that takes nothing 
> away from how darned useful (and far less bug prone) foreach is.

Actually, there are quite a few bugs related to modifying values 
and/or indexes in a foreach loop. In particular, foreach allows 
"ref" iteration over ranges that don't give ref access...