Blaming the D language

[bearophile via Digitalmars-d]

Ola Fosheim Grøstad:

> 2. Easy to write ugly code: It suffers from the same issues as 
> macros.

Do you mean C macros? I think this is not true.


> 3. Language integration: It is desirable to have an application 
> level language that can integrate well with a low level 
> language when calling out to system level libraries.

I don't understand.


> 4. Uniform conventions: a lambda is more generic.

What's bad in using something less generic?

Bye,
bearophile