std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 26 October 2014 at 22:12:20 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 10/25/2014 06:43 PM, Dicebot wrote:
>> Because of that I am going to start voting despite some 
>> arguments being
>> still in process. I hope that won't cause any tension.
>
> The dependency on external version identifiers in phobos is 
> still a complete bummer and there are still many implementation 
> issues.
> One reason why this is taking so long is that there were many 
> issues some of which still need to be addressed.

I don't consider it a major issue as I don't think std.logger 
should be used inside Phobos at all.