toString refactor in druntime

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"Benjamin Thaut"  wrote in message news:m2kt16$2566$1 at digitalmars.com... 

> I'm planning on doing a pull request for druntime which rewrites every 
> toString function within druntime to use the new sink signature. That 
> way druntime would cause a lot less allocations which end up beeing 
> garbage right away. Are there any objections against doing so? Any 
> reasons why such a pull request would not get accepted?

How ugly is it going to be, since druntime can't use std.format?