Stackless resumable functions

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 10/28/14 8:25 AM, Kagamin wrote:
> I think, it's for seamless debugging. The debugger support for
> async/await is indeed non-trivial, because code is mutated by the
> compiler a lot, but I don't think it has anything to do with
> concurrency. Official MS position is async/await has no concurrency
> problems.

Yah, my understanding of async/await is it's all single-threaded. -- Andrei