Encapsulating trust

[Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 06:44:13 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:03:01 -0700
> Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> I also don't agree with the notion of having @trusted blocks 
>> of the
>> form:
>> 
>>      @trusted {
>>          ... system code ...
>>      }
>> 
>> We already have a mechanism to do that - @trusted nested 
>> functions.
> why don't add some sugar here? nothing will stop a dedicated 
> person if
> he wants to write "bad code". yet making life harder for thouse 
> who
> knows what they doing is... anti-human. this discriminating
> knowledgeable people, forcing them obey the rules that was 
> written for
> fools. yet that rules will not stop fools of doing foolish 
> things.
>
> lose-lose.

And thus we end with the security exploits and computer errors C 
has brought into the world.