Some notes on performance

[Joakim via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 10:23:58 UTC, po wrote:
>  The first link says that Chrome is a *90* meg binary!  Gawd 
> damn. Either they write some really bloated code, or modern 
> browsers require way too much shit to function.

The latter.

On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 10:34:05 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> i believe that he means "non-stripped binary".

I think that might be stripped: Chrome is gigantic, about as big 
as the base install of an open-source unix like FreeBSD, ie 
kernel and userland.  That's why people compare web browsers to 
OS's these days. ;)