code cleanup in druntime and phobos

[Poyeyo via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:37:29 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 August 2014 at 14:32:01 UTC, Daniel Murphy 
> wrote:
>> "Dicebot"  wrote in message 
>> news:xovsaqnanmmgaltipuhz at forum.dlang.org...
>>
>>> It is not hard, it is plain unacceptable for certain people. 
>>> Call that religious reasons.
>>
>> Using github is similar to our requirement to match the code 
>> style when submitting patches.  It's non-negotiable, because 
>> there's no good reason not to do it.  You just remove those 
>> tabs, then get on with it.
>
> No it is not. GitHub is an intrusive closed ecosystem and it is 
> legitimate concern for anyone caring about the open internet. 
> The fact that I have considered D contribution more important 
> than this concern and the fact that you consider such reasoning 
> silly does not make it less legit and/or widespread. If you 
> don't want these contributions - just ignore it, someone else 
> will take care. But please avoid this pseudo-pragmatical 
> "non-negotiable" bullshit, at least in public.

It's easy to install a gogs server and upload all the git
repositories there.

In fact, I do have a gogs server for my private development. It
used to be a GitLab server, until I found about gogs.

GitLab looks and feels like GitHub, just with your own URL. Gogs
has less features (lacks groups and pull requests), but it uses
fewer resources.

Therefore it is possible to get all the technical benefits of
GitHub and none of the political concerns.