Voting: std.logger

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 15:10:35 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2 September 2014 at 14:53:17 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> If you are going to speak more about abstract performance I am 
>> going to simply ignore any of your further posts on topic.
>
> I am not abstract. These are very concrete requirements:
>
> 1. You have to be able to determine types and formatting at 
> compile time otherwise you cannot do binary logging.
>
> 2. You have to be able to determine types and formatting at 
> compile time otherwise you cannot minimize the probability of 
> introducing run-time errors by turning on full logging.

Ok, this is much more specific. With a similar concerns in mind I 
have proposed to add a `log` overload that doesn't have variadic 
arguments and takes a single pre-formatted string (with 
file/line/module as default run-time arguments). With a custom 
formatting function (compile-time or run-time at users choice) it 
should fit these requirements. Does that sounds feasible to you?