Fun with inout

[Manu via Digitalmars-d]

It'd be preferable to receive a type, rather than a function alias.


On 6 September 2014 22:21, Kagamin via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Saturday, 6 September 2014 at 11:46:17 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
>
>> Interesting. You're attacking it from the ReturnType! angle... I didn't
>> think of that.
>>
>
> Function may not have `this` parameter, then you will need to specify
> argument type anyway.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20140907/f47d4aac/attachment.html>