Getting completely (I mean ENTIRELY) rid off GC

[Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 12:38:54 UTC, Andrey Lifanov 
wrote:
> And I think of idea of complete extraction of GC from D.

You could also recompile the runtime library without the GC. 
Heck, with the new @nogc on your main, the compiler (rather than 
the linker) should even give you nicish error messages if you try 
to use it, but I've done it before that was an option.

Generally though, GC fear is overblown. Use it in most places and 
just don't use it where it makes things worse.