C++ interop - what to do about long and unsigned long?
Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Sep 11 08:39:07 PDT 2014
On Thursday, 11 September 2014 at 00:29:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 9/10/14, 4:16 PM, bachmeier wrote:
>
>> Clearly Walter and everyone should work on whatever they think
>> is important. I hope your statement doesn't imply that all
>> development effort is going to be put into C++ compatibility.
>
> Ideally it would.
Is C++ interop really that important or is it another one of
those "if D had this, *then* I would use it!" dismissals. C
interop is clearly crucial. Operating system interfaces are
written in C, and not being able to call C functions is hugely
limiting. But C++? I honestly can't envision a situation where
I would actually care about C++ interop. Is this truly a blocker
for some people? Like an actual, honest blocker and not just a
false flag?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list