Identifier resolution, the great implementation defined mess.

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 17 September 2014 at 16:25:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> I had impression that general rule is "most inner scope takes 
> priority" (with base classes being one "imaginary" scope above 
> the current one). Are there any actual inconsistencies you have 
> noticed or it just a matter of lacking matching spec entry?

There is no inconsistencies because there is no spec.