RFC: reference counted Throwable
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Sep 19 21:54:28 PDT 2014
On 9/19/14, 8:45 PM, Daniel N wrote:
> As much as I applaud our efforts for Backwards compatibility, it only
> affects code which already has been written, whereas a switch would
> affect "all" code that will be written, imho the burden both on library
> and app devs would be less if we simply redefined Throwable.
We need -nogc in the same way we need -m32 and -m64. -- Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list