RFC: reference counted Throwable
Uranuz via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Sep 20 01:42:50 PDT 2014
I'm quite a noobie in memory models but from position of user of
D language I have some ideas about syntax of switching between
memory models. I think that having everywhere declarations using
wrapper structs (like RefCounted) is not very user-friendly. But
still we need some way to say to compiler how we want to do
memory management. I have read tutorial about Rust language. It
looks not very clear for me, but I like the idea that type of
memory management is included in variable declaration.
Intead of wrapper struct like scoped!A or RefCounted!A we could
declare variables with annotations (attributes in D) to say what
memory model we want to use. Compiler should understand this
annotation and create some code for memory management. I thing
it's possible to declare some interface (maybe struct with
compile-time duck typing) to support some user-defined memory
models or modifications of basic (implemented in a language)
memory models.
Why I am saying about annotations? Because we can annotate some
function, class or just block at the module scope that should use
some sort of memory management and compiler will create
corresponding code. In that case we don't need to put wrapper
struct around all variables that use ref counting. We just
annotate some function or class declaration as ref-counted and
that's it!
It's just a concept of what I like to see in the language design
of D in future)) Of course there are a lot of problems in a
practice.
Also I think that we shouldn't impose some way of memory model to
programmer and let him choose his approach but syntax should be
simple and clear as much as it could be. Also some defaults
should be for most common cases and for *novice* users of D.
Waiting for critic or thoughts!!!))
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list