What are the worst parts of D?

[Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 16:19:31 UTC, Andrei 
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 9/23/14, 9:06 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 15:47:21 UTC, Andrei 
>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> On 9/23/14, 7:29 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>>> The lack of clear direction or communication thereof.
>>>
>>> * C++ compatibility
>>>
>>> Probably a distant third is improving build tooling. But 
>>> those two are
>>> more important that everything else by an order of magnitude.
>>
>> Well yeah, but that's just the current clear direction.  Who 
>> knows what
>> it will be next week.
>
> It's been this for a good while, and it will probably be until 
> done. -- Andrei

Here at work I'm toying with C++ compatibility right now: If it's 
viable, I would like to use D instead of C++ for a cloud tool 
that must link with C++ computer vision libraries...

Right now it sounds promising, so this feature could really be 
very interesting, not only to facilitate the integration with 
existing in-house codebase, but also for brand new projects.

I'm starting to think that there will be a lot of buzz and fuss 
about D as soon as good bindings to popular C++ libs will appear 
in the wild...

---
/Paolo