std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Sep 29 04:21:03 PDT 2014


On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 10:41:06 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 10:30:21 UTC, Marco Leise wrote:
>> If you don't have time to experiment, but believe that some
>> use case must be covered just describe it in a few words.
>
> Two things:
>
> 1. Timestamps with millisecond precision or better?

You have all that is in Datetime.

> 2. Creating one log file per day? I.e. built-in logrotate. If 
> it's not built-in, would it be difficult to add on top?

No, as said in the last review thread there are to many solution 
on different platforms. But you can build the one you need easily.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list