RFC: moving forward with @nogc Phobos

Daniel N via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Sep 29 19:22:43 PDT 2014


On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 22:15:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 9/29/14, 11:44 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
>> I don't like the idea of having to pass in template parameters
>> everywhere -- even for allocators.
>
> I agree.
>

There was a solution earlier in this thread which avoids that 
problem. When a function is annotated with @nogc there's 
sufficient info to chose the correct implementation without any 
parameters, it's already known whether we are instantiated from a 
@nogc block or not.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list