std.experimental.logger formal review round 3
Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Sep 30 01:36:24 PDT 2014
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 00:19:00 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>
> It has been mentioned in the comment already, but log4j like
> approach seems better. Also, it is sad that output range are not
> leveraged to format/sample/filter/select output of the logger.
yeah log4j is totally awesome and shows IMO how pretty something
can be build on top of std.logger. Even though it uses the
non-range LogEntry from std.logger.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list