RFC: moving forward with @nogc Phobos

[Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 16:49:48 UTC, Johannes Pfau
wrote:
>
> I guess my point is that although RC is useful in some cases 
> output
> ranges / sink delegates / pre-allocated buffers are still 
> necessary in
> other cases and RC is not the solution for _everything_.

Yes, I'm hoping this is an adjunct to changes in Phobos to reduce
the frequency of implicit allocation in general.  The less
garbage that's generated, the less GC vs. RC actually matters.