GC.sizeOf(array.ptr)

[Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 19:19:18 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
>
> Hm... looked at the code, I have no idea how the GC would 
> handle user-defined stuff. It seems to only deal with bits it 
> knows about (i.e. APPENDABLE is specifically handled in gc/gc.d)

It wouldn't.  The GC was just going to provide storage for some
number of user-defined bits.


> I think I just took the next bit available, if there was a 
> warning about GC internal bits when I added APPENDABLE, I 
> either missed it or dismissed it.

With BlkAttr defined independently in a bunch of different places
at the time, the comment would have been easy to miss.  I don't
know that it really matters anyway, but it's something I noticed
today.