ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Apr 1 12:41:47 PDT 2015
- Previous message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Next message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On 1 April 2015 at 21:39, Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 31 March 2015 at 21:49:00 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
>>
>> fwiw - very much appreciate your volunteer effort and that you probably
>> have better things to do. but in case you weren't aware and did have time
>> to look: I get the same linker error for _mulodi4. gdc works. (Arch ARM).
>>
>>
>> Laeeth.
>
>
> I weren't aware. And, sadly, I wasn't able to set up a virtual environment
> with ARM that actually works :( Any chance you could give me ssh sandbox
> access to some ARM machine for debugging session? If yes, please write me
> via public at dicebot.lv
I have a couple of ARM devices that can be used for such purposes.
You'll need to wait a month though...
Iain.
- Previous message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Next message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list