DIP76: Autodecode Should Not Throw

[Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 04:05:38 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 7 April 2015 at 03:17:26 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP76
>
> I am against this. It can lead to silent irreversible data 
> corruption.

Instead, I would like to suggest promoting the use of `handle` 
and the like:

http://dlang.org/phobos/std_exception.html#handle

This way, code that needs to be nothrow can opt in to be nothrow 
via such composition, which is also aligned with that introducing 
the risk of silent data corruption needing to be opt-in.