ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Apr 8 21:30:15 PDT 2015
- Previous message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Next message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:59:07 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:40:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
>> Experimenting on my oneplusone phone running arch (geekbench3
>> 2.9k) and will be back in range in a week. How much RAM do
>> you think you need?
>
> If it is just a PKGBUILD issue - any amount will do. If
> building ldc itself will be necessary.. well, it can be a bit
> more demanding :) I hope for the former.
Mathias Lang has kindly provided me shell access to one
Raspberry, investigating the issue.
- Previous message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Next message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list