ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Apr 11 16:04:25 PDT 2015
- Previous message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Next message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 14:03:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Thursday, 9 April 2015 at 04:30:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:59:07 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 1 April 2015 at 20:40:02 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
>>> wrote:
>>>> Experimenting on my oneplusone phone running arch
>>>> (geekbench3 2.9k) and will be back in range in a week. How
>>>> much RAM do you think you need?
>>>
>>> If it is just a PKGBUILD issue - any amount will do. If
>>> building ldc itself will be necessary.. well, it can be a bit
>>> more demanding :) I hope for the former.
>>
>> Mathias Lang has kindly provided me shell access to one
>> Raspberry, investigating the issue.
>
> Seems to work for me now with ldc / liblphobos packages 0.15.1-6
> Actual issue was so embarassing that I'd better be silent about
> it :P
Thanks, v much Dicebot. (I think you have earned the right to
own up to making simple errors without embarrassment in case you
change your mind - it might help someone else to say what it was).
Laeeth.
- Previous message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Next message: ARMv7 vs x86-64: Pathfinding benchmark of C++, D, Go, Nim, Ocaml, and more.
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list