code.dlang community transfer repository
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Apr 23 11:49:31 PDT 2015
On 4/23/15 1:57 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> On Thursday, 23 April 2015 at 16:00:31 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
>> Not perfect, but I don't think there really is anything we can do
>> about no-longer-maintained projects. It's not fair to the author that
>> they can have their project taken over and published with their name.
>> At least we can have a way to avoid displaying projects that are broken.
>>
>> -Steve
>
> Github already allows this, it also makes sure modifications are
> correctly authored (at least with the author specified in the commit,
> which can easily be faked). It think it is completely fair, the author
> published their source for others to use and modify, if someone else can
> pick up that maintenance fairly easily then they have achieved their
> goal, otherwise it will die with their loss of interest.
Well, I admit to have selfish goals in my statement :)
For example, I have a very old bit-rotting project in dcollections.
However, I do plan on resurrecting it. But what happens when I make my
updates, and find that someone else has taken over and taken the project
in a different direction than I wanted to?
If you are going to fork, you need to give it a new name. This is
standard practice for open source projects.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list