Cleaned up C++

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 24 April 2015 at 08:16:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 4/24/2015 12:23 AM, John Colvin wrote:
>> Except of course that alloca is a lot cheaper than malloc/free.
>
> That's not necessarily true. But in any case, go ahead and use 
> it if you like. Just prepare to benchmark and be disappointed 
> :-)

It is, unless one go the bump the pointer/never free road.