[hackathon] My and Walter's ideas
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Apr 25 20:40:44 PDT 2015
I've been on this project at work that took the "functionality first,
performance later" approach. It has a Java-style approach of using class
objects throughout and allocating objects casually.
So now we have a project that works but is kinda slow. Profiling shows
it spends a fair amount of time collecting garbage (which is easily
visible by just looking at code). Yet there is no tooling that tells
where most allocations happen.
Since it's trivial to make D applications a lot faster by avoiding big
ticket allocations and leave only the peanuts for the heap, there should
be a simple tool to e.g. count how many objects of each type were
allocated at the end of a run. This is the kind of tool that should be
embarrassingly easy to turn on and use to draw great insights about the
allocation behavior of any application.
First shot is a really simple proof of concept at
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/8baf3a2c4a38. I used manually replaced all "new
T(args)" with "make!T(args)" and all "new T[n]" with "makeArray!T(n)". I
didn't even worry about concatenations and array literals in the first
approximation.
The support code collects in a thread-local table the locus of each
allocation (file, line, and function of the caller) alongside with the
type created. Total bytes allocated for each locus are tallied.
When a thread exits, it's table is dumped wholesale into a global table,
which is synchronized. It's fine to use a global lock because the global
table is only updated when a thread exits, not with each increment.
When the process exits, the global table is printed out.
This was extraordinarily informative essentially taking us from "well
let's grep for new and reduce those, and replace class with struct where
sensible" to a much more focused approach that targeted the top
allocation sites. The distribution is Pareto, e.g. the locus with most
allocations accounts for four times more bytes than the second, and the
top few are responsible for statistically all allocations that matter.
I'll post some sample output soon.
Walter will help me with hooking places that allocate in the runtime
(new operator, catenations, array literals etc) to allow building this
into druntime. At the end we'll write an article about this all.
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list