dmd codegen improvements

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/19/2015 7:34 AM, anonymous wrote:
> I have a about 30 lines of numerical code (using real) where the gap is about
> 200%-300% between ldc/gdc and dmd (linux x86_64). In fact dmd -O etc is at the
> level of ldc/gdc without any optimizations and dmd without -0 is even slower.
> With double instead of real the gap is about 30%.

If it's just 30 lines of code, you can put it on bugzilla.