GC-proof resource classes

[cym13 via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 29 August 2015 at 14:17:10 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> On Saturday, 29 August 2015 at 13:14:26 UTC, ponce wrote:
>> ...
>
> All of this could be fixed by not letting the GC call 
> destructors. It's a bad, error-prone design to begin with and I 
> guarantee any semi-large D program is probably abusing 
> undefined behavior due to it.

After reading all that, I too am convinced that the GC shouldn't 
call the destructor.