Complexity nomenclature
Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Dec 4 06:06:54 PST 2015
On 12/04/2015 04:27 AM, Andrea Fontana wrote:
> And who knows, maybe someone will discover a more efficient way to
> implement "insertAfter" or the collection itself... We should change its
> name?
Of course. The old name will still work because, remember, there's a
hierarchy of operations; those that promise less automatically forward
to those that promise more. -- Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list