Some feedback on the website.

[Marc Schütz via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 16 December 2015 at 22:32:25 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:00:50PM +0000, Meta via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> There's also weird stuff like this, with an outer template and 
>> a documented inner template function.
>> 
>> http://dlang.org/phobos/std_parallelism.html#.TaskPool.amap.amap
>
> This is a limitation of ddoc that needs to be fixed.  
> Historically, template functions used to be written like this:
>
> 	template amap(Args...)
> 	{
> 		auto amap(Args args) {
> 			implementation();
> 		}
> 	}
>
> Then a shorthand was introduced (the so-called "eponymous 
> template" syntax), such that the above incantation could be 
> abbreviated to:
>
> 	auto amap(Args...)(Args args) {
> 		implementation();
> 	}
>
> It would appear that ddoc came after eponymous templates became 
> the norm, so currently, ddoc only understands ddoc comments 
> attached to the latter syntax, while it fails to recognize that 
> the former syntax is actually equivalent.  Several other 
> functions in Phobos suffer from the resulting formatting 
> disparity, IIRC map(), and maybe reduce(), and one or two 
> others. It's rare enough that we don't encounter it very often, 
> but the functions affected happen to be ones that are likely to 
> be frequently used, so we really ought to fix this limitation 
> in ddoc.

I think in this particular case it can only be done with a nested 
template, because there are two variadic parameters.