Some feedback on the website.

[Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 17 December 2015 at 19:51:19 UTC, Walter Bright 
wrote:
> That has nothing to do with Ddoc, and is more about the 
> organization of the files on github. Switching to another 
> framework does nothing for that.

Well, I basically agree with that.

I know it is hard to keep track of whose position is what in a 
thread like this, but my problem isn't with ddoc per se, it is 
more that the current process is very complicated and pretty 
opaque.

I have more hatred toward the makefiles than toward the doc 
format.

> BTW, when I was working on Phobos docs, Phobos had its own 
> std.ddoc in the Phobos repo.

std.ddoc was destroyed ages ago, the file no longer exists!