Voting For std.experimental.ndslice

Tue Dec 29 05:30:47 PST 2015

On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 07:45:14 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
wrote:
> On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 22:39:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
> wrote:
>> On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 21:43:35 UTC, Robert burner 
>> Schadek wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> Agreed
>>
>> 1. First paragraph was replaced by your variant.
>> 2. Binary representation was moved to Slice type documentation.
>> 3. Small "Quick Start" was added, so new user will start from 
>> `sliced` and `Slice`.
>>
>> http://dtest.thecybershadow.net/artifact/website-76234ca0eab431527327d5ce1ec0ad74c6421533-081dd6e9e8b3810a143d0a5fcba8d60b/web/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_ndslice.html
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Ilya
>
> Fix English: 
> http://dtest.thecybershadow.net/artifact/website-76234ca0eab431527327d5ce1ec0ad74c6421533-bfed2500425eb407bf2c97fc72e8a0c5/web/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_ndslice.html

If I am reading the code right, the number of dimensions must 
always be known at compile time, right? Is so, I suppose it was a 
performance-oriented decision and not an oversight, correct?