vibe.d benchmarks
Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Dec 31 05:29:49 PST 2015
On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 12:09:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon
wrote:
>
> That would be the other way around. TCP_NODELAY is not enabled
> in the local connection, which makes a ~20-30ms difference per
> request on keep-alive connections and is the bottleneck in this
> case. Enabling it makes the library competitive in these
> benchmarks.
When I use HTTPServerOption.distribute with libevent I get better
performance but with libasync it drops from 20000 req/s to 80
req/s. So maybe some another performance problem
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list