vibe.d benchmarks

Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Dec 31 05:29:49 PST 2015


On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 12:09:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon 
wrote:
>
> That would be the other way around. TCP_NODELAY is not enabled 
> in the local connection, which makes a ~20-30ms difference per 
> request on keep-alive connections and is the bottleneck in this 
> case. Enabling it makes the library competitive in these 
> benchmarks.

When I use HTTPServerOption.distribute with libevent I get better 
performance but with libasync it drops from 20000 req/s to 80 
req/s. So maybe some another performance problem


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list