vibe.d benchmarks

[Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 31 December 2015 at 12:09:30 UTC, Etienne Cimon 
wrote:
> That would be the other way around. TCP_NODELAY is not enabled 
> in the local connection, which makes a ~20-30ms difference per 
> request on keep-alive connections and is the bottleneck in this 
> case. Enabling it makes the library competitive in these 
> benchmarks.

I don't know how the benchmarks are set up, but I would assume 
that they don't use a local socket. I wonder if they run the 
database on the same machine, maybe they do, but that's not 
realistic, so they really should not.