Zero-length static array spec

[Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d]

On 1 February 2015 at 15:46, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 03:11:07PM +0000, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> [...]
>> Infinitely small:
>> Smaller than the smallest thing ever and then some more. Much smaller
>> than that in fact, really amazingly insignificant, a totally
>> unimpressive size, real 'wow, that's small', time.  Infinitely small
>> is just so small that by comparison, smallness itself looks really
>> humongous.  Miniscule divided by meager divided by staggeringly
>> infinitesimal is the sort of concept we're trying to get across here.
> [...]
>
> Wait wait wait... Miniscule *divided* by meager divided by staggeringly
> infinitesimal?! Wouldn't that be a non-standard number larger than any
> finite number?
>

I was going for the opposite of "multiplied".  Let's ignore that
decimal semantics exist for a moment. :)